Reviewing ICE Reports

Reviewing ICE reports is one of the most sensitive and impactful responsibilities in the ICE Tea ecosystem. It ensures that public information is trustworthy — protecting our communities with truth, not panic or misinformation.

---

Why Review Reports?

Before a report is published:

• It must be verified for accuracy and safety.
• It must comply with privacy and metadata standards.
• It should deliver clear, actionable information — not rumors or speculation.

Reviewers are the final human checkpoint before the report enters the public heatmap or dispatch system.

---

The Report Review Lifecycle

What You Receive in a Report

Each submission may include:

• 📍 Location (GPS and typed address)
• 🕒 Time (auto-recorded + manual)
• 📝 Description (who/what/where)
• 📸 Optional Media (photos or video)
• ☎️ Contact Option (may be anonymous)

Advanced reviewers may also see:

• 🔁 Prior reports from same IP/device
• 🧭 Duplicate detection flags
• 🧾 Media metadata (EXIF, GPS, timestamp)

---

Valid Reports: What to Look For

Component	What You’re Looking For
Location	Real place that matches the pin or street name
Time	Recent and realistic (not days old)
Description	First-person, focused on visible facts
Media	Optional, but should support the claim

---

Reasons to Reject a Report

• Vague or secondhand info: "I heard ICE is nearby"
• Disinformation signs: reused text, panic words, outdated timestamps
• False or troll-like: GPS in oceans, random insults
• Unverifiable: No clear time, place, or context
• Duplicate: Same device sent similar text within minutes

If unclear but not suspicious, use “Send Back” to request more detail.

---

Examples: What Would You Do?

✅ Example A

“Saw 4 ICE agents outside the courthouse on 7th Street at 10:30am. Black SUV, CA plates.”

Accept — Includes all necessary info.

---

❌ Example B

“They’re everywhere. ICE is rounding up people!”

Reject — Too vague and panic-inducing.

---

🟡 Example C

“ICE checkpoint on Main & Rose, 3 cars turning people away.”

Needs clarification — Ask for details. Are these ICE agents? What’s visible?

---

Respecting Anonymity

Many submitters are undocumented or at risk.

• 🚫 Never try to identify or trace a user.
• 🕵️‍♀️ Do not search media metadata beyond the platform.
• 🔒 If faces or license plates are visible, redact or reject.

Even well-meaning leaks can endanger real lives.

---

When In Doubt: Use Context

Use your regional knowledge and recent activity logs:

• Is the location known for ICE patterns?
• Is the report consistent with others in the system?
• Does the timestamp make sense?

---

Red Flags for Disinformation

Watch for:

• 🚩 Timestamps 6+ hours old labeled as “urgent”
• 🚩 Reports that reuse identical phrases across time/zones
• 🚩 Panic language: “They’re everywhere!” / “Mass raids!!”
• 🚩 Media mismatch: different weather, time of day
• 🚩 GPS in the ocean or unrelated countries

Tag and escalate these when in doubt.

---

Notes for Escalation

If something feels off:

• 🧠 Use “Tag for Senior Review” if available
• ✍️ Leave a moderation note explaining your concern
• 📱 Use internal comms (Signal/Discord) for rapid escalation

---

Publish, Send Back, or Reject?

Action	Use When
✅ Publish	All required info is present and trustworthy
🔄 Send Back	Missing key details, but not malicious
❌ Reject	Clearly false, harmful, duplicated, or unverifiable

Always log your decision. The audit trail builds long-term trust.

---

Legal & Ethical Boundaries

• 🚫 Do not use reverse-search tools outside platform guidance.
• 🧠 Do not share media with friends or on social media.
• 🛡️ Redact all personally identifying visuals unless explicitly authorized.

---

Reviewer Tools

You may use:

• 🗺️ Heatmap comparison tab
• 🕰️ Timestamp converters (if multiple timezones in play)
• 🧾 Metadata tools (in-app only)

Never export or manipulate report data externally.

---

Tips for Reliable Reviewing

• Keep the live heatmap open for side-by-side checking.
• Look for subtle cues like agent description and street names.
• Don’t rush: quality > quantity.

“Our credibility lives or dies in the details. Be rigorous. Be human. Be brave.”

---

Summary

• You are the final checkpoint for accuracy and harm prevention.
• Use evidence, not urgency, to guide decisions.
• Respect privacy and community risk.
• Escalate uncertainty — and protect trust in the process.